A draft ZIP by emersonian would make Zcash Community Grants hand every decision to buy, sell or hedge ZEC, and its budgets, to a separate Treasury Committee chosen by ZCAP, and publish a ten-year plan by 31 March 2027. It has no number and no vote, and was left out of the November NU7.1 polls.
Governance ·
A draft ZIP posted by emersonian on the Zcash Community Forum on 9 November 2026 would require Zcash Community Grants (ZCG) to form a separate Treasury Committee, which alone could buy, sell or convert ZEC, hedge, and set ZCG's budgets. The ZIP says that at present the ZCG Committee both chooses grants and decides, with the Financial Privacy Foundation (FPF), how ZCG's funds are held and when ZEC is sold. The ZIP has no number and no vote, and it is not on the November polls about ZCG's share of the Dev Fund.
It does not change how much accrues to ZCG or how the ZCG Committee is selected, nor decide whether a later ZIP, upgrade or vote can take funds ZCG already holds.
The ZIP's motivation: ZCG holds mostly ZEC while many grantees understand their grants in US dollars, and its funding stream is scheduled to end at the third halving, expected in late 2028. "A fall in the price of ZEC can therefore reduce ZCG's ability to fund work by a large fraction within months, with no change to any ZIP."
It argues that choosing grants and managing a treasury are different skills, and that combining them creates conflicts: "a committee under pressure to fund a popular grant may sell ZEC at a poor time, and a committee that decides when ZCG sells ZEC has information that could be misused."
On 11 November emersonian described the aim of this first draft: "What I'm going for in this first draft is consensus that we should form a team to propose a treasury plan, however it develops, and that the team should be different from the granting committee."
In the poll timeline thread, replying to emersonian, nuttycom wrote on 11 November that "it's my belief that a 10-year time horizon is insufficiently aggressive", adding: "In the startup world, you essentially never attempt to make a 10-year plan because too much changes over 10 years for such a plan to be meaningful." emersonian cross-posted the comment to the ZIP's thread the same day and replied: "I'd support a non-linear budget schedule that's more aggressive upfront."
The ZIP is an unnumbered Draft, created on 8 November 2026, that would amend ZIP 1015. Pull request 1453, opened on 9 November, is open with no reviews or comments as of 12 November 2026, and the forum thread has two posts, both by emersonian.
emersonian posted it with five other governance ZIPs just after the 8 November deadline for the NU7.1 polls. On 9 November aquietinvestor wrote, for the organisations coordinating the polls, that "we've decided to uphold the deadline and exclude these proposals from this round of polling". Those polls run from 16 to 30 November 2026, and their draft questions include the Future Dev and Legal Defense Fund ZIP and ZAP.
The draft lists open questions, among them whether 45 days is enough to select the first members and whether the ZIP can become Active by mid-December 2026, which the 31 March 2027 deadline needs. No vote on this ZIP has been scheduled.
This page was researched from Alphaday’s DAO proposal and governance forum feeds. They are open: free, no signup, no key.
Start building with the DAO proposals API
A 15-minute recipe: forty lines and a cron entry.
The same feeds as tools, for Claude, Cursor and any MCP client.
The discussion threads that come before the votes.
Stage and vote as read on 12 November 2026. Proposals move after a page is written; the forum thread and the vote have the current state. Quotes are from the posts linked beside them.